I was exploring in the catacombs and found a ladder going up. I climbed it and found a square door. I pushed open the door and found myself inside a university lecture room at 3 in the morning.
And you chose to censor your face in the worst way imaginable
briangarza1: I always appreciate when bands want to make a trip over to the ballpark on their off day during the midst of a tour. Tonight, one day removed from their sold out show at the United Center, it was very cool hosting band members and personnel from the @arcticmonkeys including lead singer Alex Turner and drummer Matt Helders. Despite the less than desirable outcome, they stayed until the very end and had a great time at their first Wrigley experience. (Posted on 28/08/2023)
This is exceedingly common. Cops will shoot their own dogs, then use their deaths as copaganda.
The vast majority of police dogs “killed in the line of duty” are killed by the cops themselves.
Cops also kill an average of 25 pet dogs every single day, per Justice Department statistics. Frequently these dogs are shot and killed while children are present.
Dogs and cops do not mix.
How you can tell from the initial announcement: It said “killed in the line of duty,” not “shot by the suspect.”
If they had someone they wanted to blame for the dog’s death, they would’ve named them. They don’t want you to think about who killed the dog.
In news media, the adage is that, if a headline is phrased as a question - Can Cheese Cure Cancer? - the answer to that question is ‘No’, because if they could, the publisher would definitely phrase it as a statement of fact: Cheese Can Cure Cancer!
In police communications, the same can be assumed of any ambiguity - ‘child killed in officer-involved shooting’ is from a cop, because if they were allowed to, they’d blame a person who wasn’t a cop for it - and the fact that they’re not naming any names means it’s something they don’t want to mention.
